LETTER: Same-sex couples need a special category

REGARDING the front page and p4 article, plus the editorial on July 14 about same-sex marriage.

I notice that your staff used a dictionary to define the meaning of a family, but then failed to use the dictionary to define the meaning of marriage.

We know that a man and a woman cease to be single when they are joined together as husband and wife in marriage.

It is obvious that two people of the same sex can't claim to be a husband and wife because they are either both male or both female.

The solution is a special category.

One exists already, which is same-sex relationship.

Why is this category not suitable?

There are other people who have a similar problem.

A man and a woman living together but not legally married are known as a defacto relationship.

If people choose to live different lifestyles why are they not prepared to have a different name or title for their new way of living?

I'm in favour of retaining the word marriage exclusively for a husband and wife relationship.




Senate committee's cashless card decision is in

premium_icon Senate committee's cashless card decision is in

Report tabled tonight delivers committee recommendation

Suncorp's big plan start with CBD store closure

premium_icon Suncorp's big plan start with CBD store closure

Big bank's central store closure a pathway to bigger plans

Reef resort money ‘used on male prostitute’

premium_icon Reef resort money ‘used on male prostitute’

Accountant's assets frozen after allegedly stealing up to $850,000.

Local Partners